Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Corruption and Culture


I had dinner this past weekend with five new friends I’ve made since arriving in Niamey.  One is a teacher at the local international school, one is a teacher at the local university, and the remaining four of us work for my organization.  All of us have spent multiple years in Africa.  A huge dinner and delicious dessert set the stage for an evening of good, long conversation.  Since it was ultimately a birthday celebration, we talked about birthdays, life stories, what brought some of us to where we are now etc.  Then the discussion changed slightly to Niger, culture, and the economy.  The person who had lived here longest in Niger, eight years to be exact, remarked that there seem to be a ton more ‘whiteys’ now in Niger than there ever was before, especially with the Chinese running the uranium plants, the Canadians with their gold mine that doubles as Canadian soil where they simply fly the gold directly in and out of that space and others.  I threw in how it saddened me that these companies are coming in, exploiting Niger’s resources without any of it actually going into the local economy…basically a form of rape to me.  I was surprised to see what effect this had around the table as the university teacher soon countered my comment saying the Nigeriens let it happen; someone, some Nigerien, had to have been paid off at some point and let these companies in.  She then went on to say she had a conversation with her Nigerien university students recently who were complaining about the same thing-these foreign companies exploiting Niger’s resources.  The teacher responded to the students by saying “Well, you let this happen…you put the president in power and are letting this corruption happen.”  I immediately responded asking how in the world the Nigerien people had a say in any of those decisions, even in the president they had/have, or whoever had made that decision to allow the companies to exploit their resources.  “You can’t truly believe that if Nigeriens knew the whole story they would have ‘allowed’ this corruption of their governments and exploitation of their resources to happen…”  The teacher looked at me in disbelief and went on to give a short speech to us at the table about how “of course the Nigeriens put them in power, of course they allowed this to happen.  It’s their culture.  Corruption is a part of their culture, it’s perfectly fine for those in power to exploit in any way they want to so of course the people allowed it.”  I could feel my blood pressure literally rising with the thoughts just bursting through my head, made worse by the nodding heads of agreement all around me at the table.  I wondered if I should express any of these thoughts to keep the conversation going but as I was outnumbered five to one and I felt I needed to think about it some more, I bit my tongue and forced myself to be quiet.…plus, I barely knew these people, really…and, even more, what if they were right?  

Of course, at first glance, I could see her point, myself having lived in West Africa for a couple of years and seeing it all first-hand:  the bribery that goes into getting anything done, the power struggles, the systems in place rendering basic procedures impossible, the feelings of entitlement to other people’s well earned money just because of relation or status.  Even more,  I’ve seen these situations and read about these topics in many countries across Africa.  Believe me, I’ve asked myself several times if it’s just the culture and they allow all these things to happen anyway so it’s their fault ultimately in the end that all these bad things are happening and that they can’t get a let up economically etc.  

But I also see the decades of oppressive systems these cultures have been forced to live under, the stripped resources (especially human) that has happened for over a 100 years, the desperation of living day to day and trying to feed your family.  And I’ve also lived side by side with Africans who looked down upon anything dishonest being done with community-earned money, communities mobilize to change for the better, to remove those in power who lacked integrity and put in place those who truly cared for the well-being of the whole.  I think of countries all over the world that have been faced with the same stigmas and situations.  The oppressed rising up to be the oppressors simply because that’s all they’ve known…it’s their only model of authority (see Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paolo Freire).  (Perhaps I should insert here that I’m writing this with a view that ultimately, corruption is a form of oppression)  Is corruption cultural, or is it a human race that is just naturally flawed?  Is the U.S. any different to have fled an oppressive culture in order to have religious freedom in a new land only to oppress those it encountered as soon as it landed in the new world?  And are we, as foreigners, any less corrupt for exploiting the resources of developing countries, taking advantage of their state of poverty and/or lack of systems in place, selling them and buying the goods in our own countries without a thought to where they came from?  (a whole other topic…)  

To think that if Nigeriens truly knew the big picture, if all were told exactly what was happening or what would happen if outside countries and companies came in to strip them of their land and resources, if Nigeriens knew what could happen if in fact much of that money was poured back into the economy or if the products leaving the country were taxed for better infrastructure, education, health systems, if Nigeriens really knew what life could be like if just systems were in place…well, I find it hard to believe they would actually still choose or allow all of that to still take place and for a president who made those decisions to be in power.  Ask those families in most of the villages across Niger who still don’t have schools or clinics nearby, who had no say in the last election, if they care that another country is making millions upon millions of dollars off resources in their own backyard that could be spent on providing their villages with education and health care…give them the whole picture and then ask them if they allowed it to happen as a result of their corrupt culture.  Just ask and see…then let me know.  Maybe I’m completely wrong.  Maybe my optimistic view of humankind shouldn’t be so optimistic after all…like the fact that it is much more well-known in the US about where the goods Americans buy are coming from and the conditions of the sweatshops and the child labor that is poured into the products.  Yet, Americans continue buying these products and organizations like Wal-Mart keep expanding.  So maybe knowledge isn’t what will actually move people, such as Nigeriens, to action against corruption or oppression.  Especially if it really is cultural and 'just the way they are.'

I welcome your thoughts.

6 comments:

  1. I too find it hard to believe that if the Nigeriens knew of the full ramifications of these choices they would have chosen to live in poverty over prosperity. I agree that when one lives with a certain culture for years on end it is extremely hard to break a cycle of allowing others to strip them of their resources and feeling like a victim of those circumstances. However the good news is that it can be broken. We do not have to live with the way things were done in the past. We can be an agent of change, as you are trying to be Bianca. It is not easy to change a culture or the mentality of the people of that culture but it can be done over time. Why just pile guilt on them by saying, "you let this happen". Why not offer them a way to start the change process and advocate for standing up for their culture and changes to make it better, more prosperous and more sustainable? I would offer that giving them an alternative (to carrying the guilt of the decisions of the past) is much more supportive and caring. Why not offer them hope and engage them in discussing ways they can have a positive influence now and in the future to helping their culture and country change. Laying blame and guilt for past choices and decisions whether yours or others is never helpful nor life changing but rather triggers feelings of defeat and hopelessness. The most amazing success stories are those that started with what appeared to be hopeless situations in which someone or a group of people decided "enough was enough" and chose to rise above and become active in change. Most times against what appeared to be insurmountable odds. May it be so for the people of Niger!

    ReplyDelete
  2. As you said, people in the US know about the corruption that happens across the world, and even in our own communities, and often change doesn't happen. But - when people who have a strong voice are being lied to, cheated, or ignored - they scream loud enough until they are heard, and change does happen. Millionaires are pretty good at screaming loud enough when their precious money is going to be taxed even more. Poor immigrant workers being exploited by Walmart, large corporate farms, and other jobs don't scream loud enough because they've been told their entire lives that their voices don't count, so why even bother.

    Bianca - keep your optimistic view of humanity, if you lose that, it will be a slippery slope to pessimism and questioning the worth of what you have dedicated your life to.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From my experience, corruption exists everywhere. Those corrupt are both those who offer and give the bribes! There is corruption in Niger, Canada, China (recent Bo Xilai scandal-one of many) and America (Walmart execs actions in Mexico). It just goes by different names and expressions.

    Being raped, plundered, lied and cheated makes you become docile, submissive and accepting of what fate hands to you and grateful if even a grain of rice lands on your plate when those handing you the grain have sacks of rice. There is still honesty in the land even when the wicked seem to have the upper hand (Elijah and the prophets of baal- there were still men who did not bend the knee to the idols)

    The end result of corruption is poverty- both of the lands and spirits. If the plunderers did not come in to steal gold and land and mineral resources, the exploited would be better for it.

    At the heart of the matter is the state of the human heart. It is desperately wicked and only through the grace of redemption are we made different and changed anew. Niger, India, America, Sri Lanka all need the same thing- A savior! (if only they saw him)!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think perhaps it is both. What I have seen is that the current system doesn't allow space or the ability to be honest. For example here in Congo, the military issues bribes or even stealing in order to finance their life. The government doesn't pay them enough to live solely on a salary. At the same time, these people are going along within the boundaries that the system/culture has deemed acceptable instead of challenging it in a positive, honest way. Anti corruption is the responsibility of everyone: government and each person. Like Elaine mentioned, people have been told that their voices don't matter thus taking away power in their own voice. However if no one challenges a system change will never come. Just my thoughts...

    ReplyDelete
  5. The comments at dinner are reductionist at best, provincial at worst.

    I really like what Ola said and hits at the truth. Corruption is everywhere and is present, alive, and thriving in the US even if without considering US corruption in international affairs.

    In the field of influence theory and behavioral science, one can categorize three levels of influence, a personal level (personal motivation, personal ability), a social level (social motivation-like peer pressure, social ability--like teamwork), and a structural level (structural motivation--reward/punishment systems, structural ability--environment whether prohibitive or conducive).

    If you want to truly enact change, you need both motivation and ability working at all three levels.

    The concept that corruption is cultural is not born out in any statistical research that I have seen (maybe I have seen the evidence yet). What I have seen is that corruption is endemic to the human race (not any one cultural). And any person that pinpoints it to one specific culture (including my own as a Nigerian) misses the way influence factors confluence with behavior.

    First, there are countries with worse corruption rankings (according to the 2011 World Audit Corruption rankings) but better human development indices, higher GDPs, better education, lower burden of disease, etc. than Niger. So corruption might be correlated but does not contain the whole story. You can be more corrupt and be considered an emerging market like Russia. Other factors that affect the holistic health of a country are democracy and by democracy I don't simply mean elections (see Wars, Guns, and Votes by Paul Collier).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Secondly, though the US ranks better (18th on the world corruption charts where 1 means least corruption) and Niger ranks worse (100th on the world corruption chart), the measure of corruption is not as robust or holistic as many of us would like.

    In other words, the US is not less corrupt because the ethnicities and cultures in the US are naturally less corrupt, they are rather less corrupt (as measured by the World Audit Corruption) because of the influence factors we talked about. If you want to stop corruption from happening not only do you work at the personal level or group level but at the structural level. In many countries (including in the US over its history) it has been MORE profitable to cheat than to play by the rules (thank you Kristie for this excellent point). So structural motivation influences people to cheat. This is not necessarily cultural. Moreover society is set up so that you CAN cheat (structural ability). If you want to remove corruption you don't throw your hands up because of a culture--you have to remove the incentive to break a rule and the ability to break a rule. Often this is what you have in the US with many rules that are not broken. It's harder for companies to cheat in the US because it often pays not to cheat and in many cases you cannot with all the auditing and reporting and shareholder and board accountability.

    In the few cases where you CAN cheat, you have to deal with peer influence (social). Other people have to have the personal motivation to help you cheat or else you lack the manpower and there needs to be enough peer pressure. The US has a high level of transparency which removes the social ability to cheat. The transparency is low in Niger which creates the ability (both socially and structurally) to cheat.

    If you miss what I'm saying about ability, look at it like this. If I want children to stop throwing a ball of paper into the trashcan I can tell them to stop. That may work sometimes. However, if I simply put the trashcan under my desk it stops without me even asking. This is personal and structural ability.

    There are lots of people in Niger that would like to change the situation but you need social motivation not just individual and you need social and structural ability or else you lose motivation. This is the same issue facing many dictators, kings, and presidents. They have zero peer/social motivation and structural motivation to be accountable to the people because the country takes little or no taxes from the people due to its rich resources. Moreover, many candidates fare better by using money to pay to people than to make the country better (personal motivation and peer motivation) due to ethnic party politics, cronyism, history, etc.

    In short, it is not enough to want something. Rather it takes a whole lot of effort, law changing to effect the enabling environmental structures, group work and group motivation to effect the change you are personally motivated to see.

    ReplyDelete